Check Here All Claims With Proof Which Dhruv Rathee Align on Modi Government Through Their New Video “The Dictator”

Dhruv Rathee is well known on YouTube for producing videos about subjects beyond his understanding, often related to criticism of the current government. Recently, he extended this scrutiny by exploring democracy in India.

Rathee presented an in-depth 30-minute video claiming India is heading inexorably towards becoming more like North Korea or Russia; its absence was notable.

Rathee’s video denouncing Prime Minister Narendra Modi for purportedly silencing free speech was made even more poignant by its dissemination among those critical of him.

This irony could not have been more palpable: even while echoing concerns over democratic principles, his video was being circulated among individuals opposed to Prime Minister Modi.

Dhruv Rathee New Video- Numerous individuals have shared Dhruv Rathee’s content, asserting that watching his video is vital if India wishes to avoid becoming like North Korea and Russia due to purported actions taken by Prime Minister Modi that allegedly undermine democracy.

Source: Google

We will critically analyse YouTuber Dhruv Rathee’s claims, precisely his conclusion that Indian democracy is at risk.

Fact Check Of Dhruv Rathee All Claims Which He Align on Government

Claim 1

Dhruv Rathee asserts that India is moving inexorably towards adopting a one-party, one-election system, similar to what has been seen in North Korea and Russia, where elections appear skewed towards their ruling government.

Fact: According to records kept by India’s Election Commission, India boasts an array of political parties with 8 national ones, 55 state level ones, and 2597 unrecognised entities.

Notably, the I.N.D.I.A an opposition coalition currently comprises over 25 political parties that include regional and national entities like the Indian National Congress, Trinamool Congress, Aam Aadmi Party, Samajwadi Party Rashtriya Janata Dal, Communist Party of India and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.

Collectively, these political parties form the opposition to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party; numerous elections held throughout this decade have yielded victories by opposition factions over its ruling counterpart over its 10-year rule.

Claim 2

Dhruv Rathee alleges that Prime Minister Modi’s ruling party uses its authority to arrest leaders of the opposition who express criticism, such as Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and former Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren (for whom there have been arrest warrants issued). These arrests serve as examples.

Fact: It is crucial to underline that these leaders face substantial legal hurdles that make bail impossible for them. On February 26, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) detained then-Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia over allegations related to irregularities in a now-abolished liquor policy.

Subsequently, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed formal charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against a senior Aam Aadmi Party leader.

Lower courts have repeatedly denied bail pleas submitted by Sisodia, the Delhi High Court, and eventually by the Supreme Court itself.

The Indian Express reported, “In dismissing former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia’s bail plea, the Supreme Court found there is “material and evidence” which “tentatively supports one of the charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) — that 14 wholesale liquor distributors made excess profits of Rs 338 crore during 10 months when an excise policy that has now been discontinued was in force.

Now turning our attention towards Hemant Soren, recent news stories of WhatsApp conversations between him and an associate discussing kickbacks tied to transfer postings of senior officers as well as illegal cartels for leaking details of state civil service examination aspirants is evidence provided by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

Media reports reveal there were 539 pages of chats and 11 trunks filled with land deeds that contributed to Hemant Soren’s arrest.

Claim 3

Dhruv Rathee asserts that the Modi government is actively undermining the federal structure by wielding undue influence through Governors and Lieutenant Governors (LGs). As an example, he points to Kerala, where Governor Arif Mohammed Khan withheld approval for eight bills proposed by its government.

Fact: Article 200 of the Indian Constitution empowers Governors with constitutional authority to forward bills for the President’s consideration or return them to Legislative Assemblies for further deliberation, withholding assent or returning them directly back to them for further review by the Legislative Assembly.

Source: Indian Constitution

Under this framework, bills passed by State Legislative Assemblies are presented for Governor approval, giving them discretion either to approve, withhold assent or reserve for the President’s consideration as appropriate.

Claim 4

Dhruv Rathee asserts that, following an unprecedented Supreme Court ruling declaring electoral bonds unconstitutional and their use for political party funding prohibited, media reports highlighted Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as the primary beneficiary, receiving approximately 55% or around Rs 6,565 crore as funding through electoral bonds.

Fact: Rathee overlooked an essential reality that political parties such as TMC DMK and BJD obtained more than 90% to 100% of their political funding from electoral bonds, including more than 50% being secured through MPs or MLAs in ruling party constituencies.

Furthermore, given these ruling parties have more than their fair share of MLAs representing them in Parliament or Legislative Assemblies, they must account for them getting such bonds secured over this amount.

Source: ECI

Claim 5

Dhruv Rathee alleges that the Modi government introduced a bill that excluded the Chief Justice of India (CJI) from the process of selecting a Chief Election Commissioner (CEC).

Following intervention by the Supreme Court in 2023, however, all three (CJI, Leader of Opposition and Prime Minister) became essential players in selecting both CECs and Election Commissioners (EC).

Fact: Prior to the 2023 Supreme Court ruling, the appointment of CECs and ECs was solely determined by the ruling government.

With the bill presented by the Modi government, however, a significant change occurred, allowing opposition leaders to participate in the selection process, which had previously been absent in such selection procedures.

At the forefront of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, N. Gopalaswami proposed that then President Pratibha Patil remove Navin Chawla, then set to assume the role of Chief Election Commissioner after Gopalaswami had retired; Gopalaswami raised concerns regarding Chawla’s perceived bias toward one political party over others;

however, President Patil found this recommendation non-binding and disregarded it; the following month, Chawla assumed this post again and oversaw these elections himself.

Claim 6

Dhruv Rathee believes the government, particularly during the ongoing farmers’ protests, is employing measures to silence any expression of opposition or dissatisfaction.

Fact: Only Fact investigative reports have shed light on the political motivations for farmers’ protests, suggesting a connection with Khalistan ideology and promotion.

It is essential to recognize that the 2021 farmers’ protest lasted nearly one year, during which time the government did not use force against demonstrators, with one exception on January 26 when Khalistani supporters attempted to breach Red Fort.

When evaluating the government’s approach towards protests, it is vitally important that we consider all relevant circumstances and events such as these when judging its approach to them.

Claim 7

Dhruv Rathee alleges that the government conducted surveillance on Ashok Lavasa’s phone following his protest against Prime Minister Modi during his term as Election Commissioner in 2019.

Fact: It should be noted that The Wire, an outlet characterised by leftist and communist leanings, was the sole source for this claim, raising serious doubts as to its veracity.

Critics have charged The Wire with pushing an agenda designed to undermine India domestically and internationally, yet no other media organisation collaborated or independently reported this story;

Also noteworthy, former election commissioner Ashok Lavasa himself has expressed disagreement with The Wire’s story through columns and articles written against its narrative on phone surveillance.

Claim 8:

Pune saw the theft of an EVM machine, prompting questions to be raised against its Election Commission.

Fact: The stolen EVM was designed solely for demonstration, not voting purposes. Demo EVMs feature a stamp indicating their purpose – training or awareness purposes only – and should be stored separately from EVMs used during elections.

Unfortunately, however, those involved believed it contained valuable items when arrested – protecting EVM integrity is of critical importance in democracy.

Claim 9:

Dhruv Rathee claimed that, according to the CAG, approximately 7,50,000 Ayushman Bharat beneficiaries have utilised mobile numbers that either do not match up or contain invalid codes.

Fact: The government recently provided clarification that mobile numbers are not required for Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) verification purposes and instead relies on Aadhaar details as PM-JAY is an entitlement-based scheme.

Mobile numbers will not impede the eligibility or treatment claims of beneficiaries. While field workers may have submitted them randomly, it won’t affect the verification process.

Claim 10

Referring to Chandigarh Mayoral Election Fraud, Dhruv Rathee claims democracy has been severely curtailed for the first time in history.

Fact: While the Chandigarh incident is certainly condemnable, historical instances such as emergency periods and election fraud in West Bengal should not be forgotten.

Workers the communist party and TMC workers looted or destroyed ballot papers and boxes during the polling period;

Calcutta High Court raised concerns in a recent case over uncontested seats in panchayat elections in West Bengal, which triggered scrutiny by the state election commission court noted abnormal situations where only candidates affiliated with ith Trinamool Congress party could file nomination papers for numerous seats despite filing numerous times by other parties than TMC candidates filing nomination papers themselves.

“Is India Becoming a Dictatorship” Dhruv Rathee Youtube Video Title

Dhruv Rathee recently uploaded a video on YouTube claiming that India is moving towards becoming a dictatorship, causing a significant impact on social media and the country as a whole.

In the video, Rathee explains the reasons behind this assertion, outlining how the Modi government is using central agencies to undermine the opposition and dismantle other political parties.

Additionally, he criticises the Indian media, often regarded as the fourth pillar of the constitution, highlighting how it is allegedly working in favour of the Modi government.

Let’s discuss the recently uploaded Dhruv Rathee video. In that case, it has garnered almost 8 million views in two days, along with approximately 9 lakh likes and around 1.5 lakh comments. People have extensively shared his videos as well.


Dhruv Rathee offers several unsubstantiated claims that lack any concrete facts. Notably, Rathee takes time in the video to affirm he did not receive financial backing from any political party for creating content, an affirmation which raises eyebrows given rumours of his affiliation with the Aam Aadmi Party; this may explain his insistence on assuring viewers the video is funded solely through personal contributions – we leave that part up to you to decide.

Here Below You can See here Dhruv Rathee New video “THE DICTATOR”–

KNOW MORE: Virat & Anushka 2nd Baby Boy “Akaay” First Image Out! See Here Now

Leave a Comment

जाने March 2024 में रिलीज होने वाली इन ब्लॉकबस्टर मूवी के बारे में जाने भारत के इन 5 मंदिरों के बारे में जहां रोज बनता है इतने लोगों का खाना TATA WPL 2024 Prize Money: जीतने वाली टीम को मिलेंगे इतने रुपये TATA WPL 2024 Qualified Teams for Playoffs Know Here AGNI – 5 Missile Specification & Features